I’ve mentioned before how influential the Videohound Golden
Movie Retriever was in shaping my cinematic tastes, partially because it
alerted me to the existence of so many obscure films with wonderfully elaborate
titles. I’ve been slowly tracking down my favorites over the past decade,
always taking an unreasonable amount of joy in finding a terrible transfer of a
film like Door-to-Door Maniac or The Severed Arm. When I recently
discovered the long sought-after The
Rats Are Coming! The Werewolves Are Here! tucked away in my beloved
Internet Archive, I was beside myself. Little did I know that I was opening
the door to perhaps the grimmest chapter in my life as a film buff.
See, TRAC!TWAH! was
directed by one Andy Milligan. That didn’t mean anything to me when I started
watching it, but it’s become highly significant in the subsequent weeks. Andy
Milligan, as it turns out, is something of a notorious figure in the world of
trash cinema. He started out making arty exploitation films (none of which I’ve
been able to track down… yet) but is now probably best known for his peculiar
brand of horror. He’s sort of a poor man’s John Waters, a gutter-dwelling
auteur with a unique vision, an unmistakable style and a thirst for sleaze. The
big difference is that Milligan lacked the playful wit and self-awareness that
made Waters an icon. In its place lay a gaping chasm of bitterness and loathing.
By all reports I’ve read, Andy Milligan was a very
unpleasant person. The product of a broken, abusive home (and, on a personal note, a native of my current hometown of Saint Paul), he was reputedly a mean, misogynistic sadist who used his art as an
outlet for all of his worst tendencies. There are plenty of artists out there
who fit that profile, but there aren’t many who approached their art so
vigorously or viciously. Andy Milligan made movies like he was mad at the very
existence of film. His cinematic world is an unholy marriage of spite and
incompetence, but I’ll be damned if I don’t find it strangely compelling.
And “compelling” really is the only word for it. I don’t
watch Andy Milligan movies because I enjoy them, or because I think they’re an
important piece of my pop cultural education. I watch them because, now that I
know they exist, I feel weirdly driven to subject myself to as many as I can.
“Subject” is also the right word, because these movies are not fun to watch by
any recognizable measure. Here are a few things you can expect from your
average Andy Milligan movie.
Elaborate
period costumes that feel slightly “off.”
Milligan apparently loved making clothes
and proudly handled costume design for most of his films, despite being only OK
at it.
Endless,
breathless conversations with little to no bearing on anything.
In Milligan’s world, couples and families
spend most of their free time talking and talking and talking in florid
language about one of two topics: how much they love each other or how much
they hate each other.
Exposition.
So, so much exposition.
When they’re not waxing purple about love
and hate, Milligan’s people are helpfully filling us in on back story with a
heavy handedness that would make a Law
& Order writer retch.
Physical
abuse of a male invalid.
As I mentioned, Milligan was a real-life
sadist. His dedication to filming his fetishes makes Quentin Tarantino’s obsession
with ladies’ feet look downright subtle.
Really
bad gore effects.
Onscreen gore was still coming into its own
during Milligan’s late ‘60s-early ‘70s heyday, but his low-grade splatter
wouldn’t have passed muster in even the earliest Herschel Gordon Lewis
features.
Awful monster
make-up.
Not every Milligan movie has a supernatural
plot, but those that do tend to end up with somebody donning a really
unfortunate werewolf mask or goofy vampire teeth.
The darkness.
I think I’ve covered the figurative
darkness of Milligan’s films already, but they’re also physically dark, to the
point that it’s often impossible to suss out what the hell is happening
onscreen. That’s not always a bad thing.
All
of that might give you the impression that Andy Milligan made “so bad it’s
good” movies. (I’m not a fan of that term in any situation, but getting into that would require
too much digression.) That isn’t the case. Andy Milligan made bad movies, plain
and simple. They aren’t fun to watch, nor are they memorable in the way transcendently
bad films like Frankenstein Island or the Ed Wood oeuvre
are. He’s the rare director whose films are improved by distraction. I often
wash dishes or perform other household chores while tackling a Milligan.
Nevertheless,
Milligan’s films are fascinating to me because they reflect an undeniable
artistic vision. Nothing else looks or feels quite like an Andy Milligan movie.
Guru the Mad Monk and The Ghastly Ones, to pick two random
examples, are set centuries apart on different continents, and filmed with an
entirely different cast. Even so, the production and tone of both films are so
similar that they’re unmistakably the work of the same creator.
There
just aren’t many directors who can place such an inimitable stamp so plainly
across a three-decade body of work. When I think of truly
distinctive directors like, say, Robert Altman or Frederico Fellini, I can
usually also point to a slew of knock-offs and homages that get the style
almost but not quite right. Even legendarily “bad” directors like Ed Wood and
Bert I. Gordon, for all their distinctive trademarks, don’t stand nearly as far
apart from their peers as does Milligan. I can’t even imagine how you’d
approach making a Milligan rip-off, although it has been done. Odd as
it may sound, I find that kind of dedication to one’s own artistic vision – even a
cruel, monotonous, incoherent one – immensely inspiring.
I’m
not alone in my unfortunate appreciation of Mr. Milligan. He’s inspired at
least one book-length biography and a slew of blogs and essays. (My personal
favorite is Joseph A. Ziemba’s dishearteningly
thorough rundown of Milligan’s horror films for bleedingskull.com.) He also
has a celebrity champion in Drive director
Nicolas
Winding Refn, who has dedicated a great deal of time and money to getting
Milligan’s films back into the public eye. I’ve noticed that there don’t seem
to be a lot of casual Milligan fans. There are those who remain blissfully
unaware of his body of work, and there are those who become obsessed by it.
Once
you have a few Milligans under your belt, you can even begin to find some
pleasures in them. For instance, I don’t know if John Miranda’s bitterly
unhinged performance as Sweeney Todd in The
Bloodthirsty Butchers is really all that good, but seeing someone act with even
a hint of nuance felt like a revelation after watching dozens of other
Milliganders alternate between lifelessness and histrionics. Likewise, if I’d
gone into Blood cold, it may not have
made much of an impression on me. Seeing it after a string of even shoddier
Milligan films, however, made its relative – very relative – competence feel
like a blessed relief.
Note before you click: This is not just a clip. This is the entire movie. You may not be able to extract yourself once you enter.
So
what do I want you to take away from this little essay? Hell, I don’t know.
Maybe I just wanted to share the misery. Maybe this is my way of trying to get
a grip on what I find so inspiring about this dreadful body of work. Maybe I
just want to know that something has
come of the hours I’ve dedicated to Andy Milligan while countless genuine classics
remain unseen by my eyes. One thing I know for certain: there’s a full-length
print of Milligan's reputedly unwatchable Surgikill up on YouTube
right now that demands my attention. Please keep me in your thoughts and prayers.
Special thanks to my man Joe Gibson for alerting me to that Nicolas Winding Refn article, and for putting up with my regular Milligan venting on Twitter.
Special thanks to my man Joe Gibson for alerting me to that Nicolas Winding Refn article, and for putting up with my regular Milligan venting on Twitter.